Case Study

Administrator Access Review for a Small Nonprofit

How a structured privileged access review improved visibility, accountability, documentation, and long-term IT management across Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace.

IndustryNonprofit
Organization Size25 to 75 Users
TechnologyMicrosoft 365 and Google Workspace
Reading Time12 Minute Read
Privacy Notice: This is an anonymized educational case study based on common administrator access review scenarios for small organizations. Details have been generalized to protect privacy while demonstrating J3 Systems Group's review process.

Project at a Glance

Client TypeSmall Nonprofit
Users25 to 75
PlatformsMicrosoft 365, Google Workspace
DeliverablesAccess register, findings, recommendations

Executive Summary

Every organization relies on trusted individuals to manage critical technology systems. Over time, administrator privileges often expand as employees change roles, new software is introduced, and temporary access becomes permanent.

Without a structured process to review and document privileged access, organizations can lose visibility into who has administrative control, why they have it, and whether that level of access is still appropriate.

This anonymized case study demonstrates how J3 Systems Group approaches an Administrator Access Review for a small nonprofit using Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. The review examined privileged access management, documentation, account ownership, and administrative accountability.

Consultant Recommendation

Administrator access should be reviewed at least annually and after major staff, vendor, or technology changes. A simple access register can give leadership much better visibility into privileged accounts.

The Challenge

The organization had grown more dependent on cloud-based systems, but its administrator access process had not grown with it. Over time, several users, service accounts, and support contacts had been granted elevated permissions to solve immediate needs.

Leadership did not have a single, reliable view of who could manage users, reset passwords, change security settings, access shared files, or modify organization-wide configurations.

The organization needed a practical way to regain visibility, reduce unnecessary access, and create a repeatable process for reviewing administrator privileges going forward.

Assessment Methodology

The Administrator Access Review was conducted as a structured evaluation of privileged access across the organization's core cloud systems.

Step 1: Identify Administrator Roles

Review users and accounts with elevated permissions across Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace.

Step 2: Validate Ownership

Confirm who owns each privileged account and whether the access still supports a current business need.

Step 3: Review Security Controls

Check multi-factor authentication, shared account usage, vendor access, and account lifecycle practices.

Step 4: Document Findings

Organize findings into clear recommendations leadership can review and act on.

Key Findings

Risk: High

Administrator Access Was Not Centrally Documented

The organization did not have one reliable source of truth showing who had administrator access across Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace.

Risk: Medium

Privileged Access Had Outgrown the Original Need

Some accounts retained elevated access after the original reason for granting that access had passed.

Risk: Medium

Account Ownership Was Not Always Clear

Some administrator or elevated-access accounts did not have a clearly documented owner or approval source.

Risk: High

Shared Access Created Accountability Concerns

Shared or general-purpose access made it harder to connect administrative activity to a specific person.

Risk Matrix

Risk AreaSeverityRecommended Priority
Shared Administrative AccessHighImmediate Review
Former Staff or Vendor AccessHighHigh Priority
Excessive Administrator AccessMediumRole Review
Missing DocumentationMediumDocumentation Update

Recommendations

  1. Create a central administrator access register.
  2. Review and reduce unnecessary privileged access.
  3. Assign clear ownership to privileged accounts.
  4. Require multi-factor authentication for administrator accounts.
  5. Replace shared administrative access where practical.
  6. Add administrator access review to offboarding.
  7. Establish a recurring review schedule.
  8. Document approval and change history.

Implementation Timeline

Phase 1: Build the Administrator Access Register

Create a central record of privileged accounts, assigned roles, account owners, business justification, multi-factor authentication status, and recommended actions.

Phase 2: Validate Current Access

Review each privileged account with the appropriate owner or decision-maker to confirm whether access is still needed.

Phase 3: Prioritize Access Changes

Prioritize former staff access, vendor accounts, shared accounts, unclear ownership, and accounts without verified multi-factor authentication.

Phase 4: Update Documentation and Ownership

Assign account owners, document business justification, and record the next review date.

Results and Outcomes

Improved Visibility

Leadership had one place to review privileged access.

Clearer Ownership

Privileged accounts could be tied to responsible owners.

Reduced Unnecessary Access

Elevated permissions could be removed or adjusted when no longer needed.

Repeatable Review Process

Future access reviews could follow the same structure.

Lessons Learned

Administrator access should never depend on memory, assumptions, or informal knowledge. Privileged access should be reviewed, documented, and managed on a recurring basis.

  • Maintain one central administrator access register.
  • Assign an owner to every privileged account.
  • Document the business reason for elevated access.
  • Require multi-factor authentication for administrator accounts.
  • Review former staff, contractor, volunteer, and vendor access.
  • Schedule recurring access reviews.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an administrator access review?

An administrator access review is a structured process for identifying who has elevated access to important systems, why they have that access, and whether the access is still appropriate.

Why does administrator access matter?

Administrator accounts can make major changes to an organization's technology environment, including resetting passwords, creating users, changing security settings, accessing files, and modifying email settings.

How often should administrator access be reviewed?

Small organizations should review administrator access at least once or twice per year and after major staff, vendor, or system changes.

Ready to Strengthen Administrator Access?

J3 Systems Group helps small businesses and nonprofits review administrator access, improve documentation, identify unnecessary permissions, and create repeatable review processes.

Schedule a Consultation